Does Deepseek get confused when connecting PCTC and QET?


	it sounds like Deepseek things Alice and Bob are the same thing with PCTC





If they are separate things, different particles with different power sources, why does the past B need to to supply electricity for A in the future?


Closing the loop:

The energy extracted at B (
Δ
E
B
ΔE 
B
​
 ) is now present in the past. For the loop to be self-consistent (Novikov principle), this energy must be used to create the exact initial conditions that lead to A’s measurement later. That includes, for example, charging the battery that will later power A’s measurement.

In other words, the 
Δ
E
B
ΔE 
B
​
  harvested in the past must supply the 
E
meas
E 
meas
​
  that A will consume in the future. Otherwise, you have an inconsistency: where does A’s battery energy come from? It can’t come from nowhere – that would be a paradox.








Because the only source of energy in the past (to power the future measurement and operation) is the energy extracted by B. 


	---- could you use Teleportation to use the positive energy at B, excess, and send it to A elsewhere to power it's electronics?
lol




Why your “local electricity” doesn’t break this
You argued that A and B use separate local batteries, so the energy extracted by B doesn’t need to pay for A’s measurement – but in a consistent time loop, those batteries are not independent. The battery that powers A’s measurement in the future must have been charged in the past. Where did that charge come from? It couldn’t have come from outside the loop (that would be an external source breaking causality). The only possible source inside the loop is B’s extracted energy.


	can you tell B in the past to tell A in the future how to and when to charge the battery that powers A?